What archaeology says
Archaeology knows the pyramid largely from the inside. Swiss-American scholar Adolph Bandelier made the first study in 1881, and from 1931 the architect Ignacio Marquina drove exploratory tunnels through the mound — eventually some eight kilometres of them — revealing that the visible mass encases a nested sequence of at least four major pyramids and many partial enlargements, each built over its predecessor. Construction began in the Late Preclassic, around the 3rd century BC, and continued in stages through the Classic period to around AD 900, with ceramics, radiocarbon dates and construction styles tying the phases to the broader sequence of highland Mexico. Murals found within — most famously Los Bebedores ('the Drinkers'), a 60-metre frieze of figures drinking pulque from about AD 200 — and the Chapulines mural of skull-headed grasshoppers belong to a distinctive local tradition with links to Teotihuacan.
In the Postclassic era the city's religious focus shifted to a new temple of Quetzalcoatl nearby, and the great pyramid was left to weather into a hill, though it remained a shrine to a rain goddess and a burial ground — hundreds of interments have been recovered from its flanks and surrounds, with INAH excavations as recently as the 2020s still turning up burials, offerings and structural remains around the complex. When Hernán Cortés reached Cholula in 1519 — perpetrating the notorious massacre in the city — the pyramid was already ancient and overgrown; the church later built on its summit is why the interior has never been fully excavated and why the monument, uniquely among the world's largest, remains mostly unexplored.
- Eight kilometres of exploratory tunnels revealing nested construction stages of adobe brick
- Ceramic sequences and radiocarbon dates tying each stage to the Preclassic–Classic sequence of highland Mexico
- Murals such as Los Bebedores (c. AD 200) matching known Mesoamerican artistic traditions
- Hundreds of excavated burials and offerings around the pyramid spanning its period of use
- Continuity of the site as a functioning shrine into Aztec and colonial times, explaining its preservation
